 |
HIGH STUDENT PERFORMANCE
Student Performance by Group
In any group where the percentage of students at a
grade level is greater than 95% or less than 5%, the actual values are not
be displayed because of federal privacy regulations. In these cases,
the results are shown as >95% or <5% for the group.
|
|
Click here to learn more about the performance of student groups.
|
|
Performance of Each Student Group on the
ABCs End-of-Grade Tests
The percentage of students, grouped by gender,
ethnicity and other factors, who passed BOTH the reading and math tests.
|
|
All |
Male
|
Female
|
White
|
Black
|
Hispanic
|
American
Indian
|
Asian
|
Pacific
Islander
|
Two
or
More
Races
|
E.D.
|
N.E.D.
|
L.E.P.
|
Migrant
Students
|
Students
with
Disabilities
|
|
2010 - 11
|
67.0%
|
64.6%
|
69.5%
|
79.0%
|
48.5%
|
54.4%
|
55.1%
|
78.2%
|
63.7%
|
69.3%
|
53.3%
|
82.8%
|
34.4%
|
45.2%
|
34.4%
|
|
2009 - 10
|
66.3%
|
64.2%
|
68.5%
|
78.7%
|
47.0%
|
51.5%
|
52.6%
|
77.3%
|
N/A
|
67.8%
|
52.1%
|
82.0%
|
33.9%
|
41.8%
|
34.4%
|
|
Percent Change
between years
|
0.7%
|
0.4%
|
1.0%
|
0.3%
|
1.5%
|
2.9%
|
2.5%
|
0.9%
|
N/A
|
1.5%
|
1.2%
|
0.8%
|
0.5%
|
3.4%
|
0.0%
|
|
• E.D. =
Economically Disadvantaged Students
|
| • N.E.D.
= Not Economically Disadvantaged Students |
| • L.E.P.
= Limited English Proficient Students |
Click here for additional information on student performance by group and subject.
|
Performance of Each Student Group on the
End-of-Grade Science Tests for NCLB
The percentage of students, grouped by gender,
ethnicity and other factors, who passed Science tests.*
|
|
All |
Male
|
Female
|
White
|
Black
|
Hispanic
|
American
Indian
|
Asian
|
Pacific
Islander
|
Two
or
More
Races
|
E.D.
|
N.E.D.
|
L.E.P.
|
Migrant
Students
|
Students
with
Disabilities
|
|
2010 - 11
|
74.2% |
75.9%
|
72.4%
|
85.6%
|
55.4%
|
63.5%
|
64.4%
|
84.2%
|
70.7%
|
76.1%
|
62.2%
|
87.3%
|
41.5%
|
57.1%
|
49.4%
|
|
2009 - 10
|
70.8%
|
72.9%
|
68.6%
|
83.6%
|
49.7%
|
57.8%
|
58.1%
|
80.5%
|
N/A
|
73.3%
|
57.4%
|
84.8%
|
40.0%
|
39.6%
|
46.7%
|
|
Percent Change
between years
|
3.4%
|
3.0%
|
3.8%
|
2.0%
|
5.7%
|
5.7%
|
6.3%
|
3.7%
|
N/A
|
2.8%
|
4.8%
|
2.5%
|
1.5%
|
17.5%
|
2.7%
|
|
* If the number of students in a category is fewer than five, then results
are not shown and are represented by a N/A.
• E.D. =
Economically Disadvantaged Students
|
| • N.E.D.
= Not Economically Disadvantaged Students |
| • L.E.P.
= Limited English Proficient Students |
Click here for additional information on student performance by group and subject.
|
Click here to learn more about the performance of student groups.
|
|
Performance of Each Student Group on the
ABCs End-of-Course Tests
The percentage of passing scores on the state
End-of-Course tests grouped by gender, ethnicity and other factors.
|
|
All |
Male |
Female |
White |
Black |
Hispanic |
American
Indian |
Asian |
Pacific
Islander |
Two
or
More
Races |
E.D.
|
N.E.D.
|
L.E.P. |
Migrant
Students |
Students
with
Disabilities |
| 2010 - 11 |
79.7% |
78.4% |
81.0% |
87.7% |
66.0% |
74.0% |
71.3% |
86.6% |
82.6% |
82.4% |
69.4% |
88.2% |
48.7% |
59.2% |
45.0% |
| 2009 - 10 |
80.7% |
80.1% |
81.3% |
88.5% |
67.0% |
74.1% |
71.7% |
88.0% |
N/A |
83.3% |
70.9% |
87.9% |
55.8% |
62.3% |
54.9% |
| Percent Change
between years |
-1.0% |
-1.7% |
-0.3% |
-0.8% |
-1.0% |
-0.1% |
-0.4% |
-1.4% |
N/A |
-0.9% |
-1.5% |
0.3% |
-7.1% |
-3.1% |
-9.9% |
* If the number of students in a category is fewer than five, then results
are not shown and are represented by a N/A.
* Geometry tests were eliminated from the ABCs effective 2010-11.
• E.D. =
Economically Disadvantaged Students
|
| • N.E.D.
= Not Economically Disadvantaged Students |
| • L.E.P.
= Limited English Proficient Students |
Click here for additional information on student performance by group.
|
Click here to learn more about adequate yearly progress.
|
|
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Results
North Carolina has set target goals that schools
must meet to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under No
Child Left Behind (NCLB).
|
|
AYP |
Targets
|
|
North Carolina
did not make
adequate yearly progress. |
We met 58
of our 82 performance targets.
|
Click here for information about the AYP and Title I Improvement status of school districts in North Carolina.
Click here for information about the AYP and Title I Improvement status of charter schools in North Carolina.
|
Click here to learn more about AYP Attendance.
|
|
AYP Attendance
|
|
North Carolina met its attendance target.
|
|
|
AYP Attendance Rate by Student Group
|
|
All
|
White
|
Black
|
Hispanic
|
American
Indian
|
Asian
|
Pacific
Islander
|
Two
or
More
Races
|
E.D.
|
L.E.P.
|
Students
with
Disabilities
|
|
2010 - 11
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
94.7%
|
>95%
|
N/A
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
94.7%
|
|
2009 - 10
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
94.5%
|
>95%
|
N/A
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
>95%
|
94.5%
|
|
Percent Change between years
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
0.2%
|
0.1%
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
N/A
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
0.2%
|
| • E.D.
= Economically Disadvantaged Students |
| • L.E.P.
= Limited English Proficient Students |
|
|
Click here to learn more about AYP Graduation Rate.
|
|
AYP Cohort Graduation Rate
This reflects the cohort percentage of students who graduated with a regular diploma in four years or less
(the four-year Cohort Graduation Rate) or for schools with a five-year program, it reflects the five-year graduation rate.
|
|
North Carolina met its cohort graduation target.
|
|
|
|
|
Cohort Graduation Rate |
|
State |
77.9% |
|
|
|
AYP Cohort Graduation Rate by Student Group
Due to data collection constraints in 2002-03 when public school officials began
keeping careful accounting for the Four-Year Cohort Graduation Rate, the subgroups
of Economically Disadvantaged and Limited English Proficiency were not reported in 2005-06.
|
|
All
|
White
|
Black
|
Hispanic
|
American
Indian
|
Asian
|
Pacific
Islander
|
Two
or
More
Races
|
E.D.
|
L.E.P.
|
Students
with
Disabilities
|
|
2010 - 11
|
77.9%
|
82.6%
|
71.5%
|
68.8%
|
69.7%
|
86.9%
|
N/A
|
77.2%
|
71.2%
|
48.1%
|
57.2%
|
|
2009 - 10
|
74.2%
|
79.6%
|
66.9%
|
61.4%
|
68.0%
|
85.2%
|
N/A
|
71.1%
|
66.2%
|
48.3%
|
57.6%
|
|
Percent Change between years
|
3.7%
|
3.0%
|
4.6%
|
7.4%
|
1.7%
|
1.7%
|
N/A
|
6.1%
|
5.0%
|
-0.2%
|
-0.4%
|
| • E.D.
= Economically Disadvantaged Students |
| • L.E.P.
= Limited English Proficient Students |
|
|
Click here to learn more about National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
|
|
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
|
|
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tests
for reading and mathematics are administered biennially. Results
for 2011 will be reported on the 2011-12 NC School Report Cards.
Visit North Carolina's NAEP website for more information.
|
|
Click here to learn more about National Board
Certified teachers & teachers with advanced degrees.
|
|
Click here to learn more about fully licensed teachers.
|
|
Click here to learn more about Highly Qualified teachers.
|
Quality Teachers
Professional Qualifications of North Carolina’s Teachers
The number of school-based personnel with National Board Certification and the percentage of teachers with advanced degrees
along with the total number of classroom teachers in the state.
|
|
|
Total Number of Classroom Teachers
|
Number of Teachers with National Board Certification
|
Percent of Teachers with Advanced Degrees
|
|
North Carolina
|
99,290
|
12,836
|
27.9%
|
| Fully Licensed Teachers
The percentage of teachers who hold clear initial or clear continuing licenses and emergency/provisional licenses
and the percentage of teachers who are entering the profession through lateral entry.
|
|
|
Total Number of Classroom Teachers
|
Percent of Fully Licensed Teachers
|
Percent of Emergency/ Provisional Licenses
|
Percent of Lateral Entry Teachers
|
|
North Carolina
|
99,290
|
96.3%
|
0.3%
|
2.7%
|
| Classes Taught by Highly Qualified
Teachers
Percentage of classes in the state taught
by Highly Qualified teachers as defined by federal law.
|
|
|
Percent of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
|
Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
|
Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in High Poverty Schools
|
Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in Low Poverty Schools
|
|
2010 - 11
|
98.0%
|
2.0%
|
2.6%
|
1.9%
|
|
2009 - 10
|
97.5%
|
2.5%
|
3.5%
|
2.0%
|
|
Percent Change between years
|
0.5%
|
-0.5%
|
-0.9%
|
-0.1%
|
|
